Protocol Citation: Michel A. Cavigelli, Timothy C. Strickland 2024. USDA LTAR Common Experiment measurement: Concentration of carbon and nitrogen in aboveground biomass. protocols.io https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bp2l62km5gqe/v1
License: This is an open access protocol distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Protocol status: Working
We use this protocol and it's working
Created: January 08, 2024
Last Modified: August 29, 2024
Protocol Integer ID: 97100
Keywords: Long-Term Agroecosystem Research, LTAR, USDA LTAR, Common Experiment, crops, carbon, nitrogen, aboveground biomass, nutrients, high-temperature, combustion, furnaces, gas chromatography, infrared gas analysis
Funders Acknowledgement:
United States Department of Agriculture
Grant ID: -
Disclaimer
This research is a contribution from the Long-Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) network. LTAR is supported by the United States Department of Agriculture. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official endorsement or approval by the United States Department of Agriculture or the Agricultural Research Service of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
Abstract
The carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) contents within a plant are determined from biomass samples collected following the USDA LTAR Common Experiment measurement: Aboveground biomass protocol. Biomass C and N measurements are critical for developing C and N balances and associated stocks and flows within agroecosystems. For these purposes, the biomass that stays in or leaves the field should undergo analysis for C and N. In addition, ratios of plant biomass C to other nutrients (including N) are valuable for 1) assessing physiological allocation of photosynthate and nutrients and residue quality and 2) defining boundaries of plant growth/physiology, stress response, and production potential and quality for modeling efforts. The recommended method for determining C and N tissue concentrations is high-temperature combustion, which involves high-temperature oxidation (>1000°C) of a sample in the presence of oxygen, reduction of nitrogen compounds to N2 in a downstream reduction furnace, and measurement of the resulting CO2 and N2 by infrared gas analysis or gas chromatography.
Sample collection, processing, and analysis
Sample collection, processing, and analysis
Send samples to a commercial laboratory or analyze them at an USDA ARS Laboratory (or University Laboratory) if equipment and personnel are available. When choosing a commercial laboratory to send the samples to consider the following factors: 1) precision, accuracy, and detection limits claimed by the lab, 2) whether the lab has a QA/QC program and reports performance data or participates in a verification consortium, and 3) as an additional verification check, whether the lab includes at least one blind check standard for every 25 test samples under analysis. The following protocol details methods for performing laboratory procedures in-house.
Collect plant biomass samples as per the USDA LTAR Common Experiment measurement: Aboveground biomass (Wilke et al., 2024) protocol. Conduct C and N analyses on a ground subsample of a size based on individual instruments and/or the N concentration of the material.
Note
More detailed subsampling for C and N concentrations in various plant components is not required and is conducted at the discretion of each site.
Analyze a portion of the dried subsample (< 1 ug to > 1000 ug; ground to 1 mm) using one of the various high-temperature combustion instruments capable of oxidizing samples at high temperature (>1000 °C), reducing nitrogen oxides, and detecting the resulting CO2 and N2, reported as total %C and %N for each sample.
Note
Since productive analysis of minuscule samples is possible, homogenization, careful grinding, and subsampling at earlier steps are critical. Determining an appropriate sample size may be necessary for a given sample type and instrument combination to meet upper and lower detection limits.
Quality assurance and quality control
Quality assurance and quality control
Sollins et al. (1999) recommend the following quality assurance/quality control procedures. Run the following specimens:
Two “bypass” samples of high concentration to condition the oxidation and reduction columns in the instrument
Two blanks
Three standards of known C and N concentrations similar to the expected range of sample concentrations to calibrate the instrument
Three to five check standards distributed through a sample run of 50 samples
If the results are more than 10% above the highest standard, reanalyze the samples using a suitable calibration standard.
Ideally, and in addition, calibrate among all LTAR instruments by running a set of blind standards.
Blank and check sample results should be included with reported data.
The meta-data should include the brand name and model of the instrument, instrument-specific detection limits, accuracy and precision ranges reported by the manufacturer, and the subsample size and combustion temperature used for analyses.
Calculations
Calculations
Calculate the content of C and N on an area basis using the aboveground biomass dry weight and the concentration (percent) of C and N.
Equation 1. Carbon content based on aboveground biomass dry weight and carbon concentration.
kg C ha-1 = Biomass dry weight (Mg ha-1) x (%C / 100) x 1000 kg Mg-1
Equation 2. Nitrogen content based on aboveground biomass dry weight and nitrogen concentration.
kg N ha-1 = Biomass dry weight (Mg ha-1) x (%N / 100) x 1000 kg Mg-1
Labor and time requirements
Labor and time requirements
Will vary with instrument and operator, but in general:
Weighing and loading samples into ceramic boats/crucibles or tin cups takes 1-5 minutes per sample.
Repacking columns (drying and reduction) requires 2-4 hours per week if instrument use is continuous.
Approximately 75 samples can be analyzed in one day.
Concurrently sampled covariate metrics
Concurrently sampled covariate metrics
Biomass dry weight from biomass sampling.
N fertilizer and/or manure/byproduct source, rate, timing, and application method.
N inputs via atmospheric deposition and irrigation.
Concentration of phosphorus, potassium, and sulfur are also recommended based on the aboveground biomass samples; see protocol (Kovar and Fortuna, 2024).
Archiving
Archiving
Follow the archival methods as described in the aboveground biomass protocol.
Illustrative information
Illustrative information
Figure 1. Soybean tissue subsample ground to < 1 mm in an archive container with the lid removed. Photograph by Michel Cavigelli.
Figure 2. Leco instrument for the use of high-temperature combustion to measure the C and N contents of samples. Photograph by Michel Cavigelli.
Recommendations for data collection
Recommendations for data collection
Table 1. Summary of recommendations for measurement of abovegroundbiomass carbon and nitrogen concentration.
A
B
C
D
Attribute
Preferred
Minimum
Comments
Spatial scale
Replicated Small Plots (< 50 sq. m),
Large Plots (50 to 1000 sq. m),
Fields
Plot
Frequency
Maximum vegetative and reproductive biomass
Every crop harvest
Harvest is annual for some crops (e.g. corn) but more frequent for other crops (e.g. alfalfa)
Covariate metrics
Depending on the questions, covariate metrics could also include soil texture and density, plant competition, herbivory, disease, or other metrics
Other
Biomass of plant parts (root, fruit, stem, and leaf), root:shoot ratios, other nutrient contents, organic chemistries, or quality metrics
Protocol references
Kovar, J. & Fortuna, A. M. (2024). USDA LTAR Common Experiment measurement: Concentration of phosphorus, potassium, and sulfur in aboveground biomass. protocols.io dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.14egn6bnql5d/v1
Sollins, P., C. Glassman, E.A. Paul, C. Swanston, K. Lajtha, J.W. Heil and E.T. Elliott. 1999. Soil Carbon and Nitrogen: Pools and Fractions. Ch. 5 in (eds. G.P. Robertson, D.C. Coleman, C.S. Bledsoe and P. Sollins). Standard Soil Methods for Long-Term Ecological Research. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 89-105. A more detailed description of the dry combustion process.