Dec 15, 2022
Protocol: Extrinsic Allergic Alveolitis- A Systematic Review of HLA-DR in Pigeon Breeder’s Disease
- Dylan Thibaut1,2,
- Ryan Witcher1,
- Anitha Kunnath1,
- James Toldi1
- 1Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine- Bradenton;
- 2University of Central Florida
Protocol Citation: Dylan Thibaut, Ryan Witcher, Anitha Kunnath, James Toldi 2022. Protocol: Extrinsic Allergic Alveolitis- A Systematic Review of HLA-DR in Pigeon Breeder’s Disease. protocols.io https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.dm6gpjzb5gzp/v1
License: This is an open access protocol distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Protocol status: Working
We use this protocol and it's working
Created: November 26, 2022
Last Modified: December 15, 2022
Protocol Integer ID: 73261
Disclaimer
No Disclaimer
Abstract
Pigeon Breeder's Pneumonitis’ complex pathogenesis affects a specific exposure group, as well as a potential genetic predisposition varying the immune response to these antigens. Previous research has begun to categorize affected individuals possessing HLA sequences as compared to normal population. This HLA meta-analysis with Pigeon Breeder’s Pneumonitis will offer a broad scope analysis of these alleles, and serve as a further prognostic application. Earlier identification of the predisposition towards Pigeon Breeder's Pneumonitis will also serve as an opportunity for potentially disease course altering treatment earlier in it's pathogenesis.
Administrative Information
Administrative Information
Title
Protocol: Extrinsic Allergic Alveolitis- A Systematic Review of HLA-DR in Pigeon Breeder’s Disease
Registration
Registration is via protocols.io
Authors
Dylan Thibaut: Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine - Bradenton, University of Central Florida
Ryan Witcher: Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine- Bradenton, AdventHealth- Daytona
Anitha Kunnath: Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine- Bradenton, AdventHealth- Daytona
Principle Investigator
Dr. James P. Toldi, DO, FAAFP, CAQSM: Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine- Bradenton
Amendments
None
Support
Sources: No financial sources utilized
Sponsor: Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine- Bradenton
Role of sponsor: Research oversight
Introduction
Introduction
Rationale
Pigeon Breeder's Pneumonitis’ complex pathogenesis affects a specific exposure group, as well as a potential genetic predisposition varying the immune response to these antigens. Previous research has begun to categorize affected individuals possessing HLA sequences as compared to normal population. This HLA meta-analysis with Pigeon Breeder’s Pneumonitis will offer a broad scope analysis of these alleles, and serve as a further prognostic application. Earlier identification of the predisposition towards Pigeon Breeder's Pneumonitis will also serve as an opportunity for potentially disease course altering treatment earlier in it's pathogenesis.
Objective
To conduct a meta-analysis to ascertain how the various HLA-DR alleles are linked with odds of developing Pigeon Breeder’s Pneumonitis.
Methods
Methods
Eligibility criteria
Only studies published after 1975 will be included for analysis purposes. Studies that cannot be accessed, do not provide adequate data on the experimental or control population, or contain data that is difficult to interpret will not be used.
Information Sources
PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library will be utilized as databases for data acquisition. Institutional access will be used for data acquisition however no attempts to contact authors will be made if access is not available. This data will be gathered for approximately 1 month.
Search Strategy
Searching will be conducted using the following terms “HLA and Pigeon Breeder Pneumonitis”, “HLA-DR and Pigeon Breeder”, “HLA-DR1 and Pigeon Breeder”, “HLA-DR3 and Pigeon Breeder”, “HLA-DR4 and Pigeon Breeder”,. When an available database feature is available, both HLA and Pigeon Breeder will be required to appear in the title in order to limit the search. One researcher, Ryan Witcher will be assigned the role of searching and data collection. Dylan Thibaut and Ryan Witcher will collaborate for the statistical analysis.
Study Records
Data Management
The data collected during the search process will be housed in google sheets for analysis with statistical software.
Selection Process
Studies will be included in the event the relevant data is readily accessible in the publication, with the minimum requirement being the presence or absence of disease among an experimental and control group. Although data will be recorded on any HLA allele that meets the aforementioned criteria, only alleles that are represented at the minimum of three times will be included in the meta-analysis. Acceptable control groups will include exposed pigeon handlers with no presence of pigeon breeder’s pneumonitis, or unrelated and unexposed normal individuals.
A control group that consists of individuals that are familially related to a pigeon breeder’s pneumonitis individual (but with no exposure to pigeons) is not an acceptable control group and will be excluded from the present analysis. If the data does not directly link the presence of an HLA allele to Pigeon Breeder’s Pneumonitis, or if the publication was created prior to the 1975 earliest date acceptable, the data will not be included. Finally, if a study only assessed the allelic frequency of specific subtypes of HLA alleles, and those subtypes corresponded to identical serotypes, the data will not be included. For example, if an individual study included genotypic frequency on both HLA-DR4*0407 and HLA-DR4*0405, these data cannot be consolidated under a single serotype HLA-DR4 and therefore will be excluded.
Data collection Process
Data will be collected by two researchers onto one Google Sheets. If the legitimacy of data or the study being assessed is questionable, the other researchers will be polled on their opinion about its inclusion or exclusion. If a consensus is not reached, the PI will be consulted for the final decision.
Data items:
Data collected included the number of cases of Pigeon Breeder’s Pneumonitis with the presence or absence of specific HLA alleles, as well as the healthy controls with the presence or absence of the specific HLA alleles. Odds ratios and confidence intervals that were found were also recorded.
Outcomes and Prioritization
All HLA data will be collected regarding their frequency with pigeon breeder’s pneumonitis. Data will only be included if at least 3 acceptable separate publications included the HLA allele and if the statistics show a significant odds ratio interval. Significance will be determined based on odds ratio confidence intervals, effect size, and heterogeneity measured with I squared.
Risk of bias in Individual Studies
Risk of bias is assessed through the NIH Quality Assessment Tool of Case Control Studies (cited below). A generated DOI plot will also be made if possible with MetaXL.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Study Quality Assessment Tools. Available from: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools. Updated 2021 July.
Data Synthesis
A: Revman 5.4 software (cited below) will be used for statistical analysis. The number of cases with a discrete HLA, total case number, the number of control with a discrete HLA will be inputs for forest plot analysis.
B: The odds ratios and their confidence intervals of each individual study will be assessed to form a single, combined odds ratio and confidence interval for each allele. Data will then be assessed with I^2 as a measure for heterogeneity. Heterogeneity above I^2 of 25% will be considered moderate or high.
C: Sensitivity analysis may be performed via Revman or other software such as MetaXL.
D: See above.
Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer Program]. Version 5.4, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020.
Meta-bias and Confidence in Cumulative Evidence
GRADE criteria will be used (cited below).
Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Harbour RT, Haugh MC, Henry D, Hill S, Jaeschke R, Leng G, Liberati A, Magrini N, Mason J, Middleton P, Mrukowicz J, O'Connell D, Oxman AD, Phillips B, Schünemann HJ, Edejer T, Varonen H, Vist GE, Williams JW Jr, Zaza S; GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004 Jun 19;328(7454):1490. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490. PMID: 15205295; PMCID: PMC428525.