Jul 10, 2024

Public workspaceMouse astrocyte territory volume analysis

  • 1Duke University
Open access
Document CitationShiyi Wang 2024. Mouse astrocyte territory volume analysis. protocols.io https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.q26g7yoo3gwz/v1
License: This is an open access document distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License,  which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Created: May 23, 2023
Last Modified: July 10, 2024
Document Integer ID: 82331
Keywords: ASAPCRN
Funders Acknowledgement:
Aligning Science Across Parkinson’s (ASAP) initiative
Grant ID: ASAP-020607
Disclaimer
DISCLAIMER – FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY; USE AT YOUR OWN RISK

The protocol content here is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, medical, clinical, or safety advice, or otherwise; content added to protocols.io is not peer reviewed and may not have undergone a formal approval of any kind. Information presented in this protocol should not substitute for independent professional judgment, advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Any action you take or refrain from taking using or relying upon the information presented here is strictly at your own risk. You agree that neither the Company nor any of the authors, contributors, administrators, or anyone else associated with protocols.io, can be held responsible for your use of the information contained in or linked to this protocol or any of our Sites/Apps and Services.
Abstract
Mouse astrocyte territory volume analysis
1. To assess the territory volume of individual astrocytes in the mouse cortex, 100 μm-thick floating sections containing anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and primary motor cortex (MOp) astrocytes labeled sparsely via PALE with mCherry-CAAX were collected.

2. High-magnification images containing an entire astrocyte (50-60 μm z-stack) were acquired with an Olympus FV 3000 microscope with the 60× objective.

3. Criteria for data inclusion required that the entirety of the astrocyte could be captured within a single brain section and that the astrocyte was in layer 2/3 of the ACC or MOp.

4. Astrocytes in which the entire astrocyte could not be captured within the section or was in other layers or outside of the ACC or MOp were not imaged.

5. Imaged astrocytes were analyzed using Imaris Bitplane software.

6. Surface reconstructions were generated, and the Imaris Xtensions “Visualize Surface Spots” and “Convex Hull” were used to create an additional surface render representing the territory of the astrocyte.

7. The volume of each territory was recorded, and astrocyte territory sizes from biological replicates were analyzed across experimental conditions using a nested two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni posthoc test.

8. For 3D Sholl analysis of individual PALE astrocytes, we first loaded images onto Imaris and then created a surface.

9. After generating the surface of astrocytes, we created filaments using ‘Add new filament (leaf icon)’.

10. For the quantification of complexity, we clicked on the gear tool on Imaris to display Sholl intersections.

11. The number of animals and cells/animals analyzed are specified in the figure legend for each experiment.