Oct 22, 2024
Frameworks, guidance and approaches for producing and using social and behavioural evidence for community protection in Public Health Emergencies: A scoping review
- Soha Karam1,
- Nadia Butler1,
- Ila Schoop Rutten1,
- Nina Gobat2,
- Olivia Tulloch2,
- Helen J J. Smith1
- 1Anthrologica, Ltd, Oxford, UK;
- 2WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
- Soha Karam: Senior Research Associate;
- Nadia Butler: Senior Research Associate
- Ila Schoop Rutten: Research Associate
- Nina Gobat: Senior Technical Officer Evidence and Analytics, Community Readiness and Resilience (CRR) Unit
- Olivia Tulloch: Technical Officer Evidence and Analytics, and WHO Focal Point for the Collective Service
- Helen J J. Smith: CEO
Protocol Citation: Soha Karam, Nadia Butler, Ila Schoop Rutten, Nina Gobat, Olivia Tulloch, Helen J J. Smith 2024. Frameworks, guidance and approaches for producing and using social and behavioural evidence for community protection in Public Health Emergencies: A scoping review. protocols.io https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bp2l62oy5gqe/v1
License: This is an open access protocol distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Protocol status: Working
We use this protocol and it's working
Created: October 21, 2024
Last Modified: October 22, 2024
Protocol Integer ID: 110396
Abstract
This scoping review aims to identify, map, and summarise existing guidance, approaches, and frameworks for producing and using social and behavioural evidence in community protection during Public Health Emergencies (PHEs). The review will summarise and critically reflect on the tools, methods and approaches to produce social and behavioural evidence for PHEs; summarise the scope and describe the characteristics, content and domains of guidance, approaches, frameworks for use of this evidence in PHEs; and summarise the key evidence gaps and the challenges and enablers that support production and use of social and behavioural evidence for community protection in health emergencies.
Attachments
Protocol references
Ames, H. M. R., Glenton, C., Lewin, S., Tamrat,
T., Akama, E., & Leon, N. (2019). Clients’ perceptions and experiences of
targeted digital communication accessible via mobile devices for reproductive,
maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health: A qualitative evidence
synthesis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2019(10),
Article CD013447.
Aromataris, E., Lockwood, C., Porritt, K.,
Pilla, B., & Jordan, Z. (Eds.). (2024). JBI Manual for Evidence
Synthesis. JBI. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-24-01
Anthrologica. (2023). Anthrologica WHO case
studies suggestion report. Oxford: Anthrologica. (Unpublished).
Bayeh, R., Yampolsky, M. A., & Ryder, A. G.
(2021). The social lives of infectious diseases: Why culture matters to
COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article
64808. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648086
Carter, S. E., Gobat, N., Pfaffman Zambruni,
J., Bedford, J., van Keef, E., et al. (2020). What questions we should be
asking about COVID-19 in humanitarian settings: Perspectives from the Social
Sciences Analysis Cell in the Democratic Republic of Congo. BMJ Global
Health, 5(e003607), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003607
Falade, A. G. (2016). Responses to spread of
Ebola virus disease epidemic in West Africa: A review. African Journal
of Medicine and Medical Sciences, 45(2), 119–134.
Gobat, N., Carter, S., Kutalek, R., Rashid, S.
F., Lees, S., & Anoko, J. N. (2024). Social science evidence for outbreak
and pandemic response: Rapid research and analytics for public health
emergencies. In R. A. Sorenson (Ed.), Principles and practice of
emergency research response (pp. 39–58). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48408-7_39
Grant, C. (2024). The role of social and
behavioural sciences in emergencies and crises. K4DD Rapid Evidence Review 3.
Institute of Development Studies: Sussex, UK. https://doi.org/10.19088/K4DD.2024.005
International Federation of Red Cross and Red
Crescent Societies (IFRC). (2022). How to listen and respond to open
community feedback: A guide to qualitative feedback management for humanitarian
response and beyond. https://communityengagementhub.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/08/IFRC_CF_Module3_EN_20221020.pdf
International Federation of Red Cross and Red
Crescent Societies (IFRC). (2023). Epidemic control toolkit: 02.
Community mapping. https://epidemics.ifrc.org/volunteer/action/02-community-mapping
Neiderud, C. J. (2015). How urbanization
affects the epidemiology of emerging infectious diseases. Infection
Ecology & Epidemiology, 5(1), Article 27060. https://doi.org/10.3402/iee.v5.27060
Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H.,
McInerney, P., Parker, D., & Baldini Soares, C. (2015). Guidance for
conducting systematic scoping reviews. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26134548/
Smith, J., & Blanchet, K. (2019). Research
methodologies in humanitarian crises. R2HC; Elrha: London.
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien,
K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., et al. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping
reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal
Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
World Health Organization (WHO). (2016). Guidance
for managing ethical issues in infectious disease outbreaks. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/250580
World Health Organization (WHO). (2018). Public
health information services: Public health situation analysis standard
operating procedures. Health Cluster, Information Management Task
Team. https://healthcluster.who.int/publications/m/item/public-health-situation-analysis-standard-operating-procedures
World Health Organization (WHO). (2021a). Evidence,
policy, impact: WHO guide for evidence-informed decision-making. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/350994
World Health Organization (WHO). (2021b). Community-centred
approaches to health emergencies: Progress, gaps and research priorities. WHO
COVID-19 social science in outbreak response. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/blue-print/who-covid-19-social-science-in-outbreak-report_15.08.21.pdf
World Health Organization (WHO). (2022). WHO
releases a public health taxonomy for social listening on monkeypox
conversations. Departmental Update. https://www.who.int/news/item/26-09-2022-who-releases-a-public-health-taxonomy-for-social-listening-on-monkeypox-conversations
World Health Organization (WHO). (2024a). Defining
community protection. https://www.who.int/publications/b/74320
World Health Organization (WHO). (2024b). WHO
competency framework, risk communication and community engagement. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/376653/9789240092501-eng.pdf?sequence=1
World Health Organization (WHO). (2024c). Infodemic
management: Protecting people from harmful health information in emergencies.
WHO Regional Office for Europe.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2017). Emergency
response framework (2nd ed.). https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240058064
World Health Organization (WHO). (2023). Strengthening
health emergency prevention, preparedness, response and resilience. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/strengthening-the-global-architecture-for-health-emergency-prevention--preparedness--response-and-resilience
Zakar, R., Yousaf, F., Zakar, M. Z., &
Fischer, F. (2021). Sociocultural challenges in the implementation of COVID-19
public health measures: Results from a qualitative study in Punjab,
Pakistan. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, Article
703825. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.703825