Sep 23, 2024

Public workspaceEasy tracking of unstained cells in ImageJ

  • 1Institute of Cell Biology, University Rostock Medical Center
Icon indicating open access to content
QR code linking to this content
Protocol CitationIsabella Gregorski, Henrike Rebl 2024. Easy tracking of unstained cells in ImageJ. protocols.io https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.261ged7rov47/v1
License: This is an open access protocol distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License,  which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Protocol status: Working
We use this protocol and it's working
Created: January 14, 2024
Last Modified: September 23, 2024
Protocol Integer ID: 93506
Keywords: tracking, unstained cells, fibroblasts, L929, HGF-1, imageJ, FIJI
Funders Acknowledgement:
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft/DFG
Grant ID: SFB 1270/1,2–299150580
Abstract

This protocol shows how stained and especially unstained cells can be tracked in ImageJ without much effort.

The aim was to establish a reproducible setup for electrical stimulation and to perform live tracking of the stimulation with a confocal laser microscope. The study also aimed to develop a methodology for a comprehensive and standardised assessment of all parameters independent of cell staining.
The underlying experiment aimed to develop methods for analysing cellular responses to electrical stimulation and to investigate the effects of electrical stimulation on the adhesion and migration behaviour of L929 and HGF-1 fibroblasts using an electrotaxis chamber. This method can be used for single cells and cell clusters and is not limited to fibroblasts. Scratch assays and other image series from the LSM can also be analysed.

For the experiment, time-lapse series were acquired every 5 minutes over 18 hours using an LSM 780 microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Germany; software: ZEN 2.3 SP1 FP3, black, Ver. 14.0.27.201). The images were exported to the ImageJ software (1.54f, Rasband, National Institute, USA) to analyse cell migration, which is presented here. Since a bicarbonate-free medium was used, additional CO2 gasification was not necessary.

Slight deviations from the original setup can lead to different results, and insufficient parameter information makes reproducibility difficult. It is, therefore, essential to provide comprehensive information, including instrument specifications, sample preparation techniques and measurement conditions. Transparent reporting and open data practices improve the reproducibility and reliability of scientific studies.
Guidelines
N/A
Materials
N/A
Safety warnings
N/A
Ethics statement
N/A
Before start
Make sure following plugins are installed
- TrackMate-StarDist
- StarDist
- CSBDeep
Depending on whether images of stained or unstained cells were taken, proceed as follows:
Step case

Image Processing
14 steps

Process → Noise → 2x Despecle
Select "Yes" to process the whole stack. Do this with every following prompt.
Image → Adjust → Brightness/Contrast

Move the sliders for Brightness and Contrast to the right until an evenly coloured background is created.

Brightness is set to around 80 % and Contrast to 100 %.
Tracking Presets
Tracking Presets
Edit → Options → Memory & Threads → Parallel threads 1
Plugins → Tracking → TrackMate
Specify frames (T)
Select StarDist detector
Continue till the detection took place and keep all spots at first.
Now set the filters on spots.


Tracker
Tracker
Set the filters on tracks.
The parameter settings must be compared with the image to remove nonsensical tracks immediately.


In the Display Options window, tick Display Spots and Display Tracks. It is extremely important to save the required files for further work steps.
To do this, use the Tracks button to save the spots, edges and tracks (Export to CSV). The Spots (All Spots) can also be exported.


Critical
Select LAP tracker and the parameters


Next, take care of the TrackScheme. Here, splits, fusions, and nonsensical tracks can be removed manually.
Expected results
Expected results
Expected result

A picture of the HGF-1 was taken, raw and processed during the experiments. This example shows the first frame of the 20 V time series. A This image is a raw brightfield image captured using Ph3 phase contrast. No additional processing or adjustments have been applied to it. B In this image, a yellow Lookup Table (LUT) has been applied to enhance the visibility and recognition of the cells. This colour mapping helps distinguish the cells from the background. C Image processed with a Variance filter (pixel radius = 5) and Gaussian blur filter (radius = 2.00), as well as increased brightness and contrast. D The nuclei of the cells have been stained with Hoechst dye, which specifically binds to DNA. This staining allows for better visualisation and identification of the cell nuclei.







Protocol references
Rasband, W.S., ImageJ, U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA,
https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/, 1997-2018.

Schmidt, U., Weigert, M., Broaddus, C. and Myers, G., 2018. Cell detection with star-convex
polygons. In Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Interven on–MICCAI 2018: 21st
International Conference, Granada, Spain, September 16-20, 2018, Proceedings, Part II 11 (pp.
265-273). Springer International Publishing.

Ershov, D., Phan, M.S., Pylvänäinen, J.W., Rigaud, S.U., Le Blanc, L., Charles-Orszag, A., Conway, J.R.,
Laine, R.F., Roy, N.H., Bonazzi, D. and Duménil, G., 2022. TrackMate 7: integrating state-of-the-art
segmentation algorithms into tracking pipelines. Nature Methods, 19(7), pp.829-832.