Apr 20, 2024

Public workspaceCarrier-assisted One-pot Sample Preparation for Targeted Proteomics Analysis of Small Numbers of Human Cells V.2

  • 1Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99354, USA;
  • 2Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99354, USA;
  • 3Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
  • Kendall Martin: kendall.martin@pnnl.gov;
  • Tong Zhang: tong.zhang@pnnl.gov;
  • William B. Chrisler: william.chrisler@pnnl.gov
  • Fillmore L. Thomas: thomas.fillmore@pnnl.gov
  • WEI-JUN QIAN: weijun.qian@pnnl.gov
  • Tujin Shi: tujin.shi@pnnl.gov
Open access
Protocol CitationKendall Martin, Tong Zhang, William B. Chrisler, Fillmore L. Thomas, WEI-JUN QIAN, Tujin Shi 2024. Carrier-assisted One-pot Sample Preparation for Targeted Proteomics Analysis of Small Numbers of Human Cells. protocols.io https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.4r3l24zbjg1y/v2Version created by Sandy Beshir
License: This is an open access protocol distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License,  which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Protocol status: Working
We use this protocol and it's working
Created: April 20, 2024
Last Modified: April 20, 2024
Protocol Integer ID: 98529
Keywords: Protein Carrier, Carrier-assisted One-pot Sample Preparation, cLC-SRM, Small Numbers of Cells, Single Cells, Mass-limited Sample, Mass Spectrometry-based Targeted Single-cell Proteomics
Funders Acknowledgement:
NIH
Grant ID: UC4 DK104167
Abstract
Protein analysis of small numbers of human cells is primarily achieved by targeted proteomics with antibody-based immunoassays, whereas they have inherent limitations (e.g., low multiplex and unavailability of antibodies for new proteins). Mass spectrometry (MS)-based targeted proteomics has emerged as an alternative in terms of being antibody-free, high multiplex, high specificity, and quantitation accuracy. Recent advances in MS instrumentation make MS-based targeted proteomics possible for multiplexed quantification of highly abundant proteins in single cells. However, there is a technical challenge for effective processing of single cells with minimal sample loss for MS analysis. To address this issue, we have recently developed a convenient protein carrier-assisted one-pot sample preparation coupled with liquid chromatography (LC) – selected reaction monitoring (SRM) termed cLC-SRM for targeted proteomics analysis of small numbers of human cells. This method capitalizes on using the combined excessive exogenous protein as a carrier and low-volume one-pot processing to greatly reduce surface adsorption losses and high-specificity LC-SRM to effectively address the increased dynamic concentration range resulted from the addition of exogeneous carrier protein. Its utility has been demonstrated by accurate quantification of most moderately abundant proteins in small numbers of cells (e.g., 10-100 cells) and highly abundant proteins in single cells. The easy-to-implement feature and no need of specific devices make this method readily accessible to most proteomics laboratories. Herein we have provided a detailed protocol for cLC-SRM analysis of small numbers of human cells including cell sorting, cell lysis and digestion, LC-SRM analysis, and data analysis. Further improvements in detection sensitivity and sample throughput are needed towards targeted single-cell proteomics analysis. We anticipate that cLC-SRM will be broadly applied to biomedical research and systems biology with the potential of facilitating precision medicine.


Guidelines
SUMMARY

A protein carrier-assisted one-pot sample preparation coupled with liquid chromatography (LC) – selected reaction monitoring (SRM) termed cLC-SRM is a convenient method for multiplexed targeted proteomics analysis of small numbers of cells including single cells. It capitalizes on using excessive exogenous protein as a carrier and high-specificity LC-SRM for targeted quantification.

INTRODUCTION

Recent technological advances in genomics (transcriptomics) allow for comprehensive precise analysis of genome (transcriptome) in single cells [1-3]. However, single-cell proteomics technologies are lagging far behind but as equally important as genomics (transcriptomics) technologies [4-8]. Furthermore, protein abundance cannot necessarily be inferred from mRNA abundance [9], and proteome is more complex and dynamic than transcriptome [10]. Given these challenges, a large number of mixed populations of cells (i.e., bulk cells) are generally used to generate comprehensive proteome data [11-13]. However, such bulk measurements average out stochastic variations of individual cells, thus obscure important cell-to-cell variability (i.e., cell heterogeneity) [4,14]. Limitations of such bulk measurements become even more severe when the cells of interest only account for a small portion of the total populations of cells (e.g., cancer stem cells within tumors at an early-stage cancer). Therefore, there is a huge knowledge gap between single-cell proteomics and genomics (transcriptomics).

Antibody-based immunoassays (e.g., flow or mass cytometry) are predominantly used for targeted proteomic analysis of single cells [6,7,15-18]. However, they suffer from low multiplex, limited specificity, and unavailability of antibodies for new proteins of interest. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based targeted proteomics has emerged as an alternative for accurate protein quantification because of its being antibody-free, high multiplex (≥150 proteins in a single analysis [19]), high quantitation accuracy (absolute amounts or concentrations), high specificity and reproducibility (≤10% CV) [20-23]. Recent significant progress in sample preparation has made MS-based single-cell proteomics possible for quantitative analysis of highly abundant proteins from single human cells. However, MS-based single-cell proteomics is still at the early infancy stage. For example, the most advanced MS platform coupled with ultralow-flow RPLC flow rates can only allow label-free MS detection and quantification of ~670-870 proteins out of the total ≥12,000 proteins in single HeLa cells [24,25].

Currently, there are six MS-based single-cell proteomics approaches available for analysis of single mammalian cells, in which four are for global proteomics (nanoPOTS: nanowell-based Preparation in One pot for Trace Samples [26]; iPAD-1: integrated proteome analysis device for single-cell analysis [27]; OAD (oil-air-droplet) chip-based single cell proteomic analysis [28]; SCoPE-MS: single cell proteomics by mass spectrometry [29]) and the other two are for targeted proteomics (cLC-SRM: carrier-assisted liquid chromatography (LC) – selected reaction monitoring (SRM) [30]; cPRISM-SRM: carrier-assisted high pressure, high-resolution separations with intelligent selection and multiplexing coupled to SRM [31]). However, all these approaches have technical drawbacks. nanoPOTS, iPAD-1, and OAD downscaling sample processing volume to 2-200 nL, are not ready for broad benchtop applications [26-28]. For SCoPE-MS, a TMT (tandem mass tag) carrier is added after single-cell processing so it cannot effectively prevent surface adsorption losses during sample processing when single tube was used for single-cell processing [29], resulting in low reproducibility with a correlation coefficient of only ~0.2-0.4 between replicates [32]. For cLC-SRM and cPRISM-SRM, using exogenous proteins as a carrier is more suitable for targeted proteomics because peptides from excessive exogenous proteins are frequently sequenced by MS/MS, which greatly reduces the chance for sequencing low abundant endogenous peptides [30,31]. Unlike global proteomics for relative quantification, the two targeted proteomics approaches can provide accurate or absolute protein analysis of small numbers of cells with high reproducibility using heavy isotope-labeled internal standards at known concentrations. When compared to cPRISM-SRM that requires prior high-resolution PRISM fractionation, resulting in many fraction samples that need to be analyzed, cLC-SRM has a significant advantage in sample throughput without fractionation and can simultaneously quantify 100s of proteins in a single analysis but with relatively lower detection sensitivity [30]. Therefore, cLC-SRM is more readily to access and should have more broad utilities for accurate multiplexed protein analysis of small numbers of cells as well as mass-limited samples.

Herein we describe a detailed protocol to perform cLC-SRM for convenient targeted proteomics analysis of small numbers of human cells including single cells. The protocol consists of the following major steps: cell sorting by FACS (fluorescence activated cell sorting), cell lysis and digestion processed in low-volume single polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tubes, LC-SRM data collection, and SRM data analysis using publicly available Skyline software (Figure 1). Its broad utility was demonstrated by absolute targeted quantification of EGFR/MAPK pathway proteins in 1-100 MCF7 or MCF10A cells along with our previously well-established SRM assays and determined pathway protein copies per cell at a wide dynamic range of concentrations [30]. We anticipate that with the detailed protocol most proteomics researchers can readily implement cLC-SRM in their laboratories for accurate protein analysis of ultrasmall samples (e.g., rare tumor cells) to meet their project needs.



REFERENCES:

CITATION
1. Wang, Z., Gerstein, M. & Snyder, M.. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nature Reviews Genetics. 10 (1), 57-63, (2009).

CITATION
2. Miyamoto, D. T. et al. RNA-Seq of single prostate CTCs implicates noncanonical Wnt signaling in antiandrogen resistance. Science. 349 (6254), 1351-1356, (2015).

CITATION
3. Wang, Y. & Navin, N. E. Advances and applications of single-cell sequencing technologies. Molecular Cell. 58 (4), 598-609, (2015).

CITATION
4. Macaulay, I. C., Ponting, C. P. & Voet, T. Single-Cell Multiomics: Multiple Measurements from Single Cells. Trends in Genetics. 33 (2), 155-168, (2017).

CITATION
5. Gavasso, S., Gullaksen, S. E., Skavland, J. & Gjertsen, B. T. Single-cell proteomics: potential implications for cancer diagnostics. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics. 16 (5), 579-589, (2016).

CITATION
6. Wu, M. & Singh, A. K. Single-cell protein analysis. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 23 (1), 83-88, (2012).

CITATION
7. Hughes, A. J. et al. Single-cell western blotting. Nature Methods. 11 (7), 749-755, (2014).

CITATION
8. Peterson, V. M. et al. Multiplexed quantification of proteins and transcripts in single cells. Nature Biotechnology. 35 (10), 936-939, (2017).

CITATION
9. Liu, Y., Beyer, A. & Aebersold, R. On the Dependency of Cellular Protein Levels on mRNA Abundance. Cell. 165 (3), 535-550, (2016).

CITATION
10. Choudhary, C. & Mann, M. Decoding signalling networks by mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 11 (6), 427-439, (2010).

CITATION
11. Mertins, P. et al. Proteogenomics connects somatic mutations to signalling in breast cancer. Nature. 534 (7605), 55-62, (2016).

CITATION
12. Zhang, H. et al. Integrated Proteogenomic Characterization of Human High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer. Cell. 166 (3), 755-765, (2016).

CITATION
13. Zhang, B. et al. Proteogenomic characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature. 513 (7518), 382-387, (2014).

CITATION
14. Gaudet, S. & Miller-Jensen, K. Redefining Signaling Pathways with an Expanding Single-Cell Toolbox. Trends in Biotechnology. 34 (6), 458-469, (2016).

CITATION
15. Giesen, C. et al. Highly multiplexed imaging of tumor tissues with subcellular resolution by mass cytometry. Nature Methods. 11 (4), 417-422, (2014).

CITATION
16. Di Palma, S. & Bodenmiller, B. Unraveling cell populations in tumors by single-cell mass cytometry. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 31, 122-129, (2015).

CITATION
17. Schulz, K. R., Danna, E. A., Krutzik, P. O. & Nolan, G. P. Single-cell phospho-protein analysis by flow cytometry. Current Protocols in Immunology. Chapter 8 Unit 8 17 11-20, (2012).

CITATION
18. Willison, K. R. & Klug, D. R. Quantitative single cell and single molecule proteomics for clinical studies. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 24 (4), 745-751, (2013).

CITATION
19. Lee, J. Y. et al. Detection of Head and Neck Cancer Based on Longitudinal Changes in Serum Protein Abundance. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. 29 (8), 1665-1672, (2020).

CITATION
20. Shi, T. et al. Advancing the sensitivity of selected reaction monitoring-based targeted quantitative proteomics. Proteomics. 12 (8), 1074-1092, (2012).

CITATION
21. Shi, T. et al. Advances in targeted proteomics and applications to biomedical research. Proteomics. 16 (15-16), 2160-2182, (2016).

CITATION
22. Lange, V., Picotti, P., Domon, B. & Aebersold, R. Selected reaction monitoring for quantitative proteomics: a tutorial. Molecular Systems Biology. 4, 222, (2008).

CITATION
23. Picotti, P. & Aebersold, R. Selected reaction monitoring-based proteomics: workflows, potential, pitfalls and future directions. Nature Methods. 9 (6), 555-566, (2012).

CITATION
24. Zhu, Y. et al. Proteomic Analysis of Single Mammalian Cells Enabled by Microfluidic Nanodroplet Sample Preparation and Ultrasensitive NanoLC-MS. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 57 (38), 12370-12374, (2018).

CITATION
25. Cong, Y. et al. Improved Single-Cell Proteome Coverage Using Narrow-Bore Packed NanoLC Columns and Ultrasensitive Mass Spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry. 92 (3), 2665-2671, (2020).

CITATION
26. Zhu, Y. et al. Nanodroplet processing platform for deep and quantitative proteome profiling of 10-100 mammalian cells. Nature Communications. 9 (1), 882, (2018).

CITATION
27. Shao, X. et al. Integrated Proteome Analysis Device for Fast Single-Cell Protein Profiling. Analytical Chemistry. 90 (23), 14003-14010, (2018).

CITATION
28. Li, Z. Y. et al. Nanoliter-Scale Oil-Air-Droplet Chip-Based Single Cell Proteomic Analysis. Analytical Chemistry. 90 (8), 5430-5438, (2018).

CITATION
29. Budnik, B., Levy, E., Harmange, G. & Slavov, N. SCoPE-MS: mass spectrometry of single mammalian cells quantifies proteome heterogeneity during cell differentiation. Genome Biology. 19 (1), 161, (2018).

CITATION
30. Zhang, P. et al. Carrier-Assisted Single-Tube Processing Approach for Targeted Proteomics Analysis of Low Numbers of Mammalian Cells. Analytical Chemistry. 91 (2), 1441-1451, (2019).

CITATION
31. Shi, T. et al. Facile carrier-assisted targeted mass spectrometric approach for proteomic analysis of low numbers of mammalian cells. Communications Biology. 1, 103, (2018).

CITATION
32. Vitrinel, B., Iannitelli, D. E., Mazzoni, E. O., Christiaen, L. & Vogel, C. Simple Method to Quantify Protein Abundances from 1000 Cells. ACS Omega. 5 (25), 15537-15546, (2020).

CITATION
33. MacLean, B. et al. Skyline: an open source document editor for creating and analyzing targeted proteomics experiments. Bioinformatics. 26 (7), 966-968, (2010).


Before start
Figure 1: Overview of all the steps in cLC-SRM (carried-assisted one-pot sample preparation coupled with liquid chromatography – selected reaction monitoring).

Nonhuman cell lysate digests (e.g., Shewanellaoneidensis) is used to pretreat PCR tubes for coating tube surface. Small numbers of human cells or single cells sorted by FACS are collected into pretreated PCR tubes. BSA protein (or nonhuman cell lysate proteome) carrier, heavy internal standard (IS), and TFE (or DDM) are added into sample tubes sequentially for facilitating cell lysis and reducing surface adsorption losses. Conceptually the combined DDM and nonhuman cell lysate proteome carrier will work well for cLC-SRM. Cell lysis is conducted by sonication, and protein denaturation is achieved by heating at high temperature. DTT and IAA reagents are used for reduction and alkylation, respectively (this step is optional). Trypsin is added for digestion with much higher ratios of trypsin over protein amount than that for standard trypsin digestion. The cap of sample tube is removed and then PCR tube is inserted into LC vial for direct LC-SRM analysis. Collected SRM data are analyzed by using publicly available Skyline software.
The step-by-step cLC-SRM analysis is shown in Figure 1. Below is the detailed protocol:
PROCEDURE
PROCEDURE
Pretreatment of PCR tubes

Add Amount100 µL of nonhuman (e.g., Shewanella oneidensis)cell lysate digests at Concentration0.2 µg/µL to PCR tubes. Incubate at room temperature for overnight to coat PCR tube surface.

Remove the cell lysate digests by pipetting, rinse PCR tubes with HPLC-grade water for 3 times, and then airdry PCR tubes in a fume hood.
Store coated PCR tubes into Temperature4 °C freezer till further use.

FACS sorting
Align a fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) (e.g., BD Influx flow cytometer) into a 96-well PCR plate using fluorescent beads with dyes that can be excited by laser source to provide reliable reference signals.
Verify that the FACS machine is well aimed for sorting cells into the bottom of PCR plates: 1) Set the angle of the sort stream to the minimum possible to maximize the success rate so that the cells will be sorted into the bottoms of wells rather than hit the sides; 2) To aim the machine, use the test stream to ‘sort’ droplets of PBS buffer (e.g., 100 droplets) onto the well of empty plate to make sure that the collected droplets are on the bottom. If the droplets do not land onto the right position, recalibrate the cell sorter and repeat till the droplets in the sort stream are collected correctly.
Place the coated PCR tubes into 96-well PCR tube rack.
Sort desired numbers of human breast cells (MCF7 or MCF10A) into precoated PCR tubes.
Immediately centrifuge the sorted breast cells at 100 x g for 10 min at Temperature4 °C C to keep them at the bottom of the tube to avoid potential cell loss.

Store the sorted cells into Temperature-80 °C freezer until further analysis.

Addition of protein carrier, heavy internal standards, and TFE
Add Amount4 µL of 25 mM NH4HCO3 into PCR tubes containing collected cells.

Add Amount1 µL of 10 ng/µL bovine serum albumin (BSA) in 25 mM NH4HCO3 into sample tubes.

Add Amount0.3 µL of 100 fmol/µL crude heavy peptide standards (total 30 fmol) into sample tubes.

Note
Note:
Aliquots of crude heavy peptide standards for EGFR/MAPK pathway proteins are made at a nominal concentration of 100 fmol/µL in 25 mM NH4HCO3 and dispense of the small volume of crude heavy peptide standards at 100 fmol/µL into the middle of the solution and make sure there is no left-over liquid in the pipet tip.


Add Amount9 µL of 100% TFE into sample tubes with the final concentration of ~60% TFE.

Centrifuge at 1500 x g for 5 min and then gently vortex at 100 x g for 3 min.
Cell lysis and protein denaturation
Sonicate FACS-sorted breast cells on ice for 1 min with 1-min interval for a total of 5 cycles at the amplitude at 70% and Amount0.5 Hz .

Incubate samples at Temperature90 °C for 1 h for protein denaturation using a PCR thermocycler with the heated-lid option.
Note
Note:
TFE is a volatile solvent with boiling point of Temperature74 °C , and thus the heated-lid option is selected to avoid complete drying with substantial sample loss.



Cool samples to room temperature with centrifugation at Amount1500 g for 3 min.

Reduction and alkylation (optional)
Add Amount0.6 µL of 50 mM DTT with the final concentration of 2 mM. DTT solution need to be freshly prepared each time.

Note
Note:
Weigh Amount77.5 mg of DTT and then dissolve into Amount1 mL of 25 mM NH4HCO3 to make 500 mM DTT. Amount10 µL of 500 mM DTT is then added into Amount90 µL of 25 mM NH4HCO3to make 50 mM DTT.


Centrifuge at Amount1500 g for 5 min and then gently mixed at 850 rpm for 3 min.

Incubate at Temperature56 °C for 1 h with gentle shaking at Amount100 g .

Cool samples to room temperature and centrifuge at Amount1500 g for 3 min.

Add Amount0.5 µL of 60 mM IAA to the RT-PCR tube with the final concentration of ~2 mM. IAA solution need to be freshly prepared each time.

Note
Note:
Weigh Amount74.3 mg of IAA and then dissolve into Amount1 mL of 25 mM NH4HCO3 to make 400 mM IAA. Amount15 µL of 400 mM IAA is added into Amount85 µL of 25 mM NH4HCO3 to make 60 mM IAA.



Incubate in the dark at room temperature for 30 min with gentle shaking at Amount100 g .

Note
Note:
The reduction and alkylation steps are optional when there are no cysteine-containing peptides selected for target proteins.


Trypsin digestion
Reduce the sample volume down to ~4 µL for greatly reducing TFE volume using a Speed Vac concentrator.

Note
Note:
TFE is a volatile solvent with boiling point at Temperature74 °C . High percentage TFE inhibits trypsin digestion.


Add Amount9 µL of 25 mM NH4HCO3 and 1-3 µL of 15 ng/µL trypsin for digestion with the final trypsin concentration 1-3 ng/µL.

Note
Note:
For 10 FACS-sorted human breast cells (~1 ng), the ratio of trypsin enzyme over protein is ≥15:1, 750-fold higher than that in standard trypsin digestion (the ratio of 1:50).


Mix gently at Amount100 g for 3 min and incubate overnight (~16 hours) at Temperature37 °C .

Add Amount0.5 µL of 5% formic acid to stop enzymatic reaction.

Centrifuge for 1 h at Amount1500 g .

Store in Temperature-80 °C freezer until further LC-SRM analysis or in Temperature4 °C freezer for immediate analysis.

Preparation for direct LC-SRM analysis
Remove the cap of PCR tube that is used for collection (Step 2) and processing (Step 6) of FACS-sorted breast cells.
Insert PCR tube into LC vial.
Close the LC vial for LC-SRM analysis.

Note
Note:
For small numbers of cells processed in 96-well PCR plate, the mat cover will be added to seal the plate for direct LC-SRM analysis.

LC-SRM analysis
Analyze samples using UPLC coupled to a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer.
Connect capillary C18 columns (75 µm i.d. × 20 cm for standard gradient and 100 µm i.d. × 10 cm for short gradient) to a chemically etched 20 μm i.d. fused silica electrospray emitter via a stainless metal union.
Use Amount20 µL sample loop for directly loading all of the sample (~15 µL in total) into LC column to maximize detection sensitivity.

Use 0.1% formic acid in water as mobile phase A and 0.1% formic acid in 90% acetonitrile as mobile phases B for capillary RPLC separation.

Use the binary LC gradient at flow rates of 300 nL/min for standard gradient when large numbers of target proteins (>10) are measured. Standard gradient: 5-20% B in 26 min, 20-25% B in 10 min, 25-40% B in 8 min, 40-95% B in 1 min and at 95% B for 7 min for a total of 52 min and the analytical column re-equilibrated at 99.5% A for 8 min.
Use the binary LC gradient at flow rates of 400 nL/min for short gradient when small numbers of target proteins (≤10) are measured. Short gradient for fast separation: 5-95% B in 5 min and the analytical column re-equilibrated at 99.5% A for 5 min with a total 10 min LC run time.
Operate the QQQ mass spectrometer with ion spray voltages of 2,400 ± 100 V, a capillary offset voltage of 35 V, a skimmer offset voltage of -5 V and a capillary inlet temperature of Temperature220 °C .

Obtain the other QQQ MS parameters from automatic tuning and calibration without further optimization.
Spike different concentrations of crude heavy peptide standards into 20-50 ng/µL of nonhuman cell lysate digests before LC-SRM analysis of samples to determine peptide LC retention time (RT) for building scheduled SRM method and potential interference transitions for accurate quantification.
Use the RT scheduled SRM mode for multiplexed quantification with the scan window of ≥6 min.

Note
Note:
The scan window will be adjusted accordingly depending on the number of transitions in a certain time window.

Set the total cycle time to 1 s, and the dwell time for each transition is automatically adjusted depending on the number of transitions scanned at different retention time windows. A minimal dwell time 10 ms is needed for each SRM transition. All target proteins can be simultaneously monitored in a single LC-SRM analysis
Data Analysis
Import raw data files into publicly available Skyline software [33] for data visualization of each target peptide to determine their detectability.
Use two criteria to determine SRM peak detection and integration: 1) same LC retention time; 2) approximately the same relative SRM peak intensity ratios across multiple transitions between endogenous (light) peptides and their corresponding (heavy) isotope-labeled peptide internal standards.
Inspect all the SRM data manually to ensure correct SRM peak assignment and SRM peak boundary for reliable quantification using the above two criteria.
Use the best transition having high SRM signal but without matrix interference for protein quantification and the other transitions as a reference.
Use multiple replicates to obtain the standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV).
Calculate the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) by the peak apex intensity over the average background noise within a retention time region of ±15 s for standard gradient and ±6 s for short gradient. The limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ) are defined as the lowest concentration points at which the S/N ratio is at least 3 and 7, respectively.
Apply one additional criteria for conservatively determining the LOQ values besides S/N ≥7: surrogate peptide response against different cell numbers must be within the linear dynamic range.
Use the Excel software to plot all calibration curves. Load the RAW data from QQQ MS into publicly available Skyline software to display graphs of extracted ion chromatograms (XICs) of multiple transitions of target proteins monitored.
DISCUSSION
DISCUSSION
cLC-SRM is a convenient targeted proteomics method that enables accurate multiplexed protein analysis of small numbers of cells including single cells. This method capitalizes on protein carrier-assisted one-pot sample preparation, in which all steps including cell collection, multistep cell lysis and digestion, transfer of peptide digests to capillary LC column for MS analysis, are performed in one pot (e.g., single tube or single well) (Figure 1). This ‘all-in-one’ low-volume one-pot processing effectively maximizes the recovery of small numbers of cells for targeted proteomics analysis by greatly reducing possible surface absorption losses.

There are two critical steps for cLC-SRM analysis: 1) after FACS sorting, immediate centrifugation is required to ensure that the collected cells are at the bottom of tubes or wells because low volume (~15 µL) is used to process small numbers of cells; 2) prior to the addition of trypsin for digestion, the TFE levels need to be reduced down to ≤10% for effective digestion. To avoid drying out samples resulting in unrecoverable loss, frequently checking the sample volume (~4 µL of the remaining volume) is suggested during Speed Vac concentrating. One-pot sample preparation can be further simplified by removal of reduction and alkylation steps with neglectable effect on digestion efficiency. One drawback is that cysteine containing peptides cannot be selected as surrogate peptides for target proteins. To avoid Speed Vac concentrating step for TFE removal we consider replacing TFE with MS-compatible surfactants (e.g., DDM: n-Dodecyl β-D-maltoside) for cell lysis because frequent checking sample volume severely prevents automation of sample processing with low throughput. This was evidenced by our recent data for DDM-assisted global single-cell proteomics analysis (unpublished). In addition, single carrier protein (e.g., BSA) may not be sufficient to unbiasedly reduce surface adsorption losses for every protein. This was evidenced by a few undetected proteins at >30,000 copies per cell (e.g., MAP2K1) in 10 MCF7 cells that should have been detected [30]. Non-human cell lysates presumably can be used as a more effective proteome carrier in contrast to our current BSA carrier because there are many different types of nonhuman proteins (e.g., >3000 proteins for Shewanella oneidensis) with less interference for SRM detection of human proteins. We are working on several different ways to further improve cLC-SRM performance with the potential of moving towards sensitive targeted single-cell proteomics.

When compared to other MS-based single-cell proteomics methods that require specific devices, cLC-SRM can be readily implemented in any MS proteomics laboratory without additional investment on specific devices for sample processing. But it can only be used for quantitative analysis of target proteins of interest. Unlike global single-cell proteomics methods for relative untargeted quantification, cLC-SRM can provide accurate or absolute quantification of target proteins in small numbers of cells including single cells. Furthermore, cLC-SRM has significant advantages over conventional targeted single-cell proteomics using antibody-based immunoassays in terms of multiplexing and quantitation specificity and accuracy. Future developments will focus on significant improvements in detection sensitivity and sample throughput for enabling rapid absolute quantification of most proteins (e.g., important negative feedback regulators) in single human cells. Automation of cLC-SRM is another direction to improve its robustness, reproducibility, and the overall sample throughput with commercially available liquid handlers. We anticipate that cLC-SRM will be broadly used for multiplexed accurate quantification of target proteins in small subpopulations of cells and rare tumor cells as well as mass-limited samples. In turn, it will be greatly beneficial to current biomedical research and systems biology.