May 08, 2023

Public workspacePeer support implementation strategy in health: scope review V.1

DOI
dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.14egn2drzg5d/v1
  • 1UFMS
Rafael Aiello Bomfim
Icon indicating open access to content
QR code linking to this content
DOI: dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.14egn2drzg5d/v1
Protocol Citation: Rafael Aiello Bomfim, Jean Ribeiro Leite, Giovana Soares Buzinaro, Jhenyffer Andrade Viana Cabral, Hazelelponi Nauman Cerqueira Leite 2023. Peer support implementation strategy in health: scope review. protocols.io https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.14egn2drzg5d/v1
License: This is an open access protocol distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License,  which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Protocol status: Working
We use this protocol and it's working
Created: May 08, 2023
Last Modified: May 08, 2023
Protocol Integer ID: 81603
Keywords: peer implementation , peer influence, peer support, health, randomized clinical trials
Abstract
The use of peer support consists of a strategy that uses non-professionals, raised to the status of "leaders", inserted within a context, helping technically and emotionally people with social weaknesses or certain illnesses to adopt, transform and/or strengthen your health habits. Goal. This study aimed to map the implementation strategy of peer support, presenting its potential in research on the implementation of health actions in the context of primary health care. A scope review will be carried out on the use of peer support in the implementation of health actions according to the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology. A search was carried out in the databases (Pubmed, Scielo, Scopus and Web of science) and gray Literature.
Guidelines
Search, selection and eligibility strategies
The research will take place in four databases: PUBMED, Web of Science, Scielo and Scopus and gray literature. The search strategy will use the related keywords:
The search will be limited to articles published from 2016 to 2023 (April), which meet the eligibility criteria: a) Results of peer-reviewed implementation research, preferably randomized clinical trials b) Health outcome assessment c) Reported at least one implementation outcome d) published in English or Portuguese e) qualitative research related to feedback from participants regarding the implementation of peer support health actions.
Studies that presented only health outcomes or implementation only with specialists will be excluded. Literature reviews, systematic reviews and pilot studies were excluded.
The selection will be made by two authors for greater fidelity of the search strategy, initially by reading the title and abstract, later selected based on the complete reading, justified by both authors and additional reading of the co-authors.

Data extraction and analysis
The following data will be extracted from the articles and organized in a Microsoft Excel 2010 table: title, year of publication, country, type of study, theobjective of the study, description of the intervention, health outcome and implementation outcome.

Analyzed implementation outcomes

The definitions provided by Lorthios-Guilledroit et.al (2018) will be used to determine the outcomes examined in the studies, as the implementation outcomes were not always clearly stated in the articles. Among the sought implementation outcomes, nine will be considered the most important to be sought: 1) Acceptability: perception among users that the intervention is acceptable; 2) Adoption: intention, initial decision, or action to try to adopt a new intervention by participating users; 3) Appropriateness: perception of the relevance of the intervention in a particular context or for a specific public; 4) Feasibility: theextent to which a new intervention can be carried out in a context or organization; 5) Fidelity: degree to which the intervention is delivered as it was initially planned, without the need for adaptation; 6) Implementation Cost: incremental (and total) cost of the implementation strategy; 7) Coverage/Reach: degree to which the population eligible to receive the intervention actually receives it; 8) Effects: what is the effect generated in the user's self-management; 9) Sustainability: extent to which an intervention is maintained and institutionalized in a given context.
Before start
mapping peer-influence or peer-support or peer-led on health outcomes.
Peer support implementation strategy in health: scope review
Protocol references
1.Penney D. Defining “Peer Support”: Implications for Policy, Pratice, and Research. Advocates for Human Potential. 2018 [citado 20 out 2022]; https://www.ahpnet.com/AHPNet/media/AHPNetMediaLibrary/White%20Papers/DPenney_Defining_peer_support_2018_Final.pdf
2.Garn SD, Glümer C, Villadsen SF, Malling GMH, Christensen U. Understanding the mechanisms generating outcomes in a Danish peer support intervention for socially vulnerable people with type 2-diabetes: a realist evaluation. Arch Public Health [internet]. 2021 [citado 20 out 2022];79(1):160. Disponível em: doi.org/10.1186/s13690-021-00676-3.
3.Lorthios-Guilledroit A, Richard L, Filiatrault J. Factors associated with the implementation of community-based peer-led health promotion programs: A scoping review. Eval Program Plann [internet]. 2018 [citado 20 out 2022];68:19-33. Disponível em: doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.01.008.
4.Majjouti K, Küppers L, Thielmann A, Redaélli M, Vitinius F, Funke C, van der Arend I,Pilic L,Hessbrügge M, Stock S, Weltermann B, Wild D. Family doctors’ attitudes toward peer support programs for type 2 diabetes and/or coronary artery disease: an exploratory survey among German practitioners. BMC Prim Care [internet]. 2022 [citado 20 out 2022] 31, 23: 220. Disponível em: doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01827-3
5.Vigué GP, Prieto IC, Sáez RDR, Masana RV, Algado SS. Training Peer Support Workers in Mental Health Care: A Mixed Methods Study in Central Catalonia. Front Psychiatry [internet]. 2022 [citado 20 out 2022];13:7917-24. Disponível em: doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.791724.
6.Tracy K, Wallace SP. Benefícios dos grupos de apoio de pares no tratamento da dependência. Subst Abus Reabil [internet]. 2016 [citado 20 out 2022]; 7:143-154. Disponível em: doi.org/10.2147/SAR.S81535.
7.Topping KJ. Peer Education and Peer Counselling for Health and Well-Being: A Review of Reviews. Int J Environ Res Public Health [internet]. 2022 [citado 20 out 2022];19(10):6064. Disponível em: doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106064.
8.Mayer MK, Urlaub DM, Guzman-Corrales LM, Kowitt SD, Shea CM, Fisher EB. "They're Doing Something That Actually No One Else Can Do": A Qualitative Study of Peer Support and Primary Care Integration. J Ambul Care Manage [internet]. 2016 [citado 20 out 2022];39(1):76-86. Disponível em: doi.org/10.1097/JAC.0000000000000079.
9.Kent M. Developing a Strategy to Embed Peer Support into Mental Health Systems. Adm Policy Ment Health [internet]. 2019 [citado 20 out 2022];46(3):271-276. Disponível em: doi.org/10.1007/s10488-018-0912-8.
10.Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco AC, Khalil, H. Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews (2020 version). In: Aromataris E, Munn Z (Editors). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI [internet] 2020 [citado 28 out 2022]. Disponível em doi:10.46658/JBIMES-20-12.
11.Lorthios-Guilledroit A, Richard L, Filiatrault J. Factors associated with the implementation of community-based peer-led health promotion programs: A scoping review. Eval Program Plann [internet]. 2018 [citado 22 out 2022];68:19-33. Disponível em: doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.01.008.
12.Cordeiro L, Soares CB. Revisão de escopo: potencialidades para a síntese de metodologias utilizadas em pesquisa primária qualitativa [Internet]. Boletim do Instituto de Saúde - BIS [internet]. 2019 [citado 26 out 26]; 20( 2): 37-43. Disponível em:http://docs.bvsalud.org/biblioref/2019/10/1021863/bis-v20n2-sintese-de-evidencias-qualitativas-37-43.pdf
13.Day C, Harwood J, Kendall N, Nicoll J. Impact of a peer-led, community-based parenting programme delivered at a national scale: an uncontrolled cohort design with benchmarking. BMC Public Health [Internet]. 2022 [citado 26 out 2022];22(1). Disponível em: doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13691-y.
14.Mark D, Hrapcak S, Ameyan W, Lovich R, Ronan A, Schmitz K, Hatane L. Peer Support for Adolescents and Young People Living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: Emerging Insights and a Methodological Agenda. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep [internet]. 2019 [citado 26 out 2022];16(6):467-474. Disponível em: doi.org/10.1007/s11904-019-00470-5.
15.Chang LW, Nakigozi G, Billioux VG, Gray RH, Serwadda D, Quinn TC, Wawer MJ, Bollinger RC, Reynolds SJ. Effectiveness of peer support on care engagement and preventive care intervention utilization among pre-antiretroviral therapy, HIV-infected adults in Rakai, Uganda: a randomized trial. AIDS Behav [internet]. 2015 [citado 20 out 2022];19(10):1742-51. Disponível em: doi.org/10.1007/s10461-015-1159-y.
16.Grov C, Flynn AW, D’Angelo AB, Lopez-Rios J, Pantalone DW, Holloway IW, Parsons JT. Gay and Bisexual Men’s Strategies to Maintain Daily Adherence to Their HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Medication: Results from a Qualitative Study. Prevention Science [Internet]. 2019 [citado 26 out 2022];20(1):168-77. Disponível em: doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-0985-y
17.Tangmunkongvorakul A, Chariyalertsak S, Amico KR, Saokhieo P, Wannalak V, Sangangamsakun T, Goicochea P, Grant R. Facilitators and barriers to medication adherence in an HIV prevention study among men who have sex with men in the iPrEx study in Chiang Mai, Thailand. AIDS Care [internet]. 2013 [citado em 22 out 2022];25(8):961-7. Disponível em: doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2012.748871.
18.Lemons A, Beer L, Finlayson T, McCree DH, Lentine D, Shouse RL. Characteristics of HIV-Positive Transgender Men Receiving Medical Care: United States, 2009–2014. American Journal of Public Health [Internet]. Jan 2018 [citado 26 out 2022];108(1):128-30. Disponível em: doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2017.304153
19.Monroe A, Nakigozi G, Ddaaki W, Bazaale JM, Gray RH, Wawer MJ, Reynolds SJ, Kennedy CE, Chang LW. Qualitative insights into implementation, processes, and outcomes of a randomized trial on peer support and HIV care engagement in Rakai, Uganda. BMC Infect Dis [internet]. 2017 [citado 26 out 2022];17(1):54. Disponível em: doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-2156-0. PMID: 28068935; PMCID: PMC5223463.
20.Dyer KE, Moreau JL, Finley E, Bean-Mayberry B, Farmer MM, Bernet D, Kress A, Lewis JL, Batuman FK, Haskell SG, Hamilton AB, Moin T. Tailoring an evidence-based lifestyle intervention to meet the needs of women Veterans with prediabetes. Women & Health [Internet]. 2020 [citado 26 out 2022];60(7):748-62. Disponível em: doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2019.1710892
21.Kowalski CP, Veeser M, Heisler M. Formative evaluation and adaptation of pre-and early implementation of diabetes shared medical appointments to maximize sustainability and adoption. BMC Fam Pract [internet]. 2018 [citado 26 out 2022];19(1):109. Disponível em: doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0797-3.
22.Drake C, Abadi MH, Batchelder HR, Richard BO, Balis LE, Rychener D. National Implementation of a Group-Based Program Promoting Patient Engagement and Peer Support in the Veterans Health Administration: A Multi-Methods Evaluation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health [Internet]. l2022 [citado 26 out 2022];19(14):8333. Disponível em: doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148333
23.Sharma S, Mehra D, Akhtar F, Mehra S. Evaluation of a community-based intervention for health and economic empowerment of marginalized women in India. BMC Public Health [internet]. 2020 [citado 26 out 2022];20(1):1766. Disponível em: doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09884-y.
24.Cavalcanti YW, Padilha WWN, Paulino MR, Moreira MSC. Motivation, practices and perception of surgeons-dentists about the work on Primary Care on João Pessoa - PB. RFO UPF [internet]. 2010 [citado 26 out 2022];15(3). Disponível:http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-40122010000300002
25.Lopresti S, Willows ND, Storey KE, McHugh TF. Indigenous Youth Mentorship Program: key implementation characteristics of a school peer mentorship program in Canada. Health Promot Int [internet]. 2021 [citado 26 out 2022];36(4):913-923. Disponível em: doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaa090.
26.Ferguson LJ, Girolami T, Thorstad R, Rodgers CD, Humbert ML. “That’s What the Program Is All about… Building Relationships”: Exploring Experiences in an Urban Offering of the Indigenous Youth Mentorship Program in Canada. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health [Internet]. 2021 [citado 26 out 2022];18(2):733. Disponível em: doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020733
27.Tobe SW, Maar M, Roy MA, Warburton DE. Preventing Cardiovascular and Renal Disease in Canada's Aboriginal Populations. Canadian Journal of Cardiology [Internet]. 2015 [citado 26 out 2022];31(9):1124-9. Disponível em: doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2015.05.024
28.Jurczuk M, Bidwell P, Martinez D, Silverton L, Van der Meulen J, Wolstenholme D, Thakar R, Gurol-Urganci I, Sevdalis N. OASI2: a cluster randomised hybrid evaluation of strategies for sustainable implementation of the Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury Care Bundle in maternity units in Great Britain. Implementation Science [Internet]. 2021 [citado 26 out 2022];16(1). Disponível em: doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01125-z
29.Ali B, Chauhan S. Inequalities in the utilisation of maternal health Care in Rural India: Evidences from National Family Health Survey III & IV. BMC Public Health [Internet]. 2020 [citado 26 out 2022];20(1). Disponível em: doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08480-4
30.Cassie H, Mistry V, Beaton L, Black I, Clarkson JE, Young L. An evaluation of the implementation of quality improvement (QI) in primary care dentistry: a multi-method approach. BMJ Open Quality [Internet]. 2021 [citado 26 out 2022];10(2):e000839. Disponível em: doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000839
31.Fuller SM, Kotwal AA, Tha SH, Hill D, Perissinotto C, Myers JJ. Key Elements and Mechanisms of a Peer-Support Intervention to Reduce Loneliness and Isolation among Low-Income Older Adults: A Qualitative Implementation Science Study. J Appl Gerontol [internet]. 2022 [citado 22 out 2022]; 2:7334648221120458. Disponível em: doi.org/10.1177/07334648221120458.